Pick a sample scenario or paste your own game state. Get a structured second opinion, compare it with the move you were about to make, then give quick feedback on what was useful. Research-grade decision capture follows your consent setting.
Use a sample or write the visible game state yourself.
Ask for diagnosis, risks, plans, and alternatives.
Commit your instinct before seeing AI advice.
Useful, ignored, changed mind, or regretted.
Research sharing is opt-in and can stay off.
Describe your current Civ VI position and get a structured strategic second opinion.
Start briefState what you would do first, then compare it against an AI recommendation.
Start duelTry a prepared strategy situation before using your own game.
Browse samplesAdvisor and brief experiments only unless a real adapter is explicitly shown as wired.
View labsLoad one into Strategy Brief or Decision Duel to test whether the advice is specific enough before using your own game. Each sample carries its game, scenario id, visible state, options, dilemma, and sample-source flag into consent-aware capture.
Turn 118. You are behind Korea and Germany in science, but you have the strongest local military. A neighboring Rome is massing units near your border while your economy is stable but not explosive.
Should I convert the military lead into a war now, or stabilize before the timing window closes?
Act 2 after the first elite. Deck has strong late scaling but weak block density. You can take a greedy power, a mediocre defensive card, or path into another elite before a late rest site.
Is the deck strong enough to greed, or should I prioritize surviving Act 2?
Early expansion planning. Your nation has strong sacreds but expensive commanders. You can lean into an aggressive bless, safer scales, or a mixed expansion plan with conservative research.
Should this position maximize early expansion pressure or protect long-game stability?